There are many types of occupancy sensors on the market, each with different capabilities, limitations, and trade-offs. The right choice depends on your use case, space type, privacy posture, and scalability requirements.
Below is a comparison of common occupancy sensing technologies and how they stack up against key performance criteria.
| Sensor Type | Description | Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Passive Infrared (PIR) | Detects motion based on changes in infrared radiation from warm bodies. |
|
|
| Ultrasonic | Emits sound waves and measures changes in the echo to detect movement. |
|
|
| Pressure-based | Uses pressure sensors embedded in furniture to detect seated presence. |
|
|
| Wi-Fi/Bluetooth Tracking | Tracks devices connected to or visible via the building’s network. |
|
|
| Camera-based Vision | Uses computer vision to analyze images for people count, identity, and behavior. |
|
|
| Thermal Sensors (e.g., Butlr) | Detects human body heat and movement without identifying features. |
|
|
Why Butlr Uses Thermal Sensing
Butlr’s thermal-based occupancy sensors are purpose-built to provide accurate, real-time data while preserving privacy and enabling easy deployment:
Privacy-First: No video, no audio, no PII — only body heat detection
Accurate: Detects individuals whether they’re moving or seated
Wireless: Battery-powered with 2+ year life; no rewiring or hard installs
Scalable: Simple magnetic mounting enables rapid rollout across locations
Flexible: Ideal for offices, retail, senior living, healthcare, education, and more
Thermal sensing is the most balanced approach for organizations that need reliable occupancy data without the complexity or privacy risks of camera-based or device-based systems.
Comments
Please sign in to leave a comment.